Best Bridge Camera for Stunning Photos • Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 Review

When the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 was first released, it was one of the best zoom cameras on the market. Thanks to its larger sensor, ease of use, excellent autofocusing, and the inclusion of 4k video technology, the FZ1000 consistently beat its opponents in the races.

It was a pretty penny at the time, but things have changed now that time has passed…

5 years later, it’s is still an impressive piece of equipment, and this Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 review will show you everything you need to know. 

In this panasonic lumix dmc-fz1000 review, we look to see if the camera has aged gracefully enough to justify it’s new, lower price. Is this still one of the best budget cameras for photographers?

Is it still a worthwhile investment for both hobbyists and photography beginners alike? Read on to read what we have to say about the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 these days.


Panasonic all the way!


Key Specs of the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000

Size: 5.4 x 3.9 x 5.1”

Weight: 1.83 lbs

Sensor Size: 20.9 MP 1” MOS Sensor

Lens: Built-in 9.12-146mm Leica lens (25-400mm FF equivalent)

Video: Up to 4k video recording

Built-in Image Stabilization: YES


Review for Best Bridge Camera – Panasonic Lumix FZ1000



The FZ1000 is a long zoom or “bridge” camera, which is essentially a hybrid of a point-and-shoot and a DSLR. The idea behind bridge cameras is to combine the most desirable traits from both systems – the accessibility of a point-and-shoot combined with the image quality of a DSLR. Many people find this system enjoyable as they don’t have to worry about changing lenses or fiddling with overly complicated settings.

That said, for a bridge camera, the Panasonic FZ1000 is a little on the bulky side, though it’s still not as cumbersome as a full DSLR. The grip of the Panasonic FZ1000 is nice and comfortable, which does help counterbalance the camera’s heft.

Whether or not it’s too big is really a matter of preference; some photographers may feel burdened by the Panasonic FZ1000 while others may find it well-balanced.

The Panasonic FZ1000 has a lot of buttons and dials that can be used to control exposure. These are all well placed and shooting feels very natural with the FZ1000.

Note: if there is a setting you cannot change via the physical controls, you can change the buttons’ function through the in-camera menus.

The Panasonic FZ1000 is made from high-grade plastics and rubber materials. Whether or not photographers like the feeling of plastic in their hands is up to them, but I will say that rubberized grips are a nice addition. This camera was not built to withstand the elements though, so be careful when taking it into adverse conditions.


Score: 4/5



Features and Performance

The Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 is a surprisingly fast camera. Processing speeds are excellent, start-up times are quick, and the burst shooting modes are capable. Considering this bridge camera is pushing 5 years old now, which is a lifetime for camera technology, the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 is still pretty impressive.

Users can cruise through the in-camera menus without experiencing any sort of lag. The menus are well laid out and very easy to understand. We mentioned that the start-up time is quick as well, which means you won’t have to wait to start shooting.

On that note, the LCD screen of the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 is bright and clear, further adding to the optimal menu-browsing experience. It’s not a touchscreen but the inclusion of such tech kind of feels like it would be superfluous. The screen is physically modifiable and can be rotated on several axes.

One of the most impressive parts about the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000’s performance is the amount of burst shooting modes it offers. Users can shoot up to 12 fps with the manual shutter and even 50fps under certain conditions (no RAW, 5 Mp files, electronic shutter).

Given the FZ1000’s stellar autofocus, moving targets shouldn’t be a problem. (Note that Live View is only available at 7 fps or less.)

The EVF of the dmc-FZ1000 was one of the highest quality EVFs at the time of its release and it is still impressive to this day. The attention paid to such tech is especially appreciated by photographers; one look through this baby and you’ll see why.

One thing that the FZ1000 lacks is a built-in ND filter, which some photographers use to mix things up. It’s not a huge exclusion – the FZ2000 has one – but for some, it’s an important feature.


Score: 4.5/5



Image Quality

With a larger than average (for a bridge camera) 1” sensor and excellent optics, courtesy of Leica, image quality in the Panasonic FZ1000 is a cut above the rest.

Most bridge cameras have smaller 1/2.3” sensors, which do not handle low-light situations very well, much to the frustration of enthusiasts. With a larger 1” sensor, the Panasonic FZ1000 has a respectable dynamic range and handles noise gracefully.

Images shot at higher ISOs retain detail and color, and are still usable at extreme ISOs. If you’re a photographer that likes to shoot in dimly-lit situations or needs more ISO for compensation, the FZ1000 is still one of the best bridge cameras on the market.

The Panasonic FZ1000 has a Leica lens with a 16X zoom range and a 35mm-equivalent focal range of 25-400mm. The aperture is not constant but f/2.8-4.0.

Although sharp, the lens of the Panasonic FZ1000 is not the longest or fastest lenses out of all the bridge cameras. Many other rival models can shoot at longer focal lengths and at a constant f/2.8 aperture, which would be an argument against the FZ1000 if the camera didn’t beat its competitors in nearly every other optical category. With the larger sensor, images from the FZ1000 look better, and so the trade-off is more than acceptable. 

Those who want a bridge camera with a bit more length should consider upgrading to the newer model: the Panasonic Lumix FZ2000.

Let it be said, bridge cameras are still not as adept at handling harsh lighting conditions as an APS-C or Full Frame camera.


Score: 4/5



The Lumix FZ1000 focuses quickly and accurately thanks to the inclusion of Panasonic’s own “Depth from Defocus” technology. The autofocus is so quick that it leaves other bridge cameras in the dust, and can even be compared to some more premium DSLRs. Officially, the dmc-FZ1000’s autofocus is rated at 0.09 seconds and 0.17 seconds at the telephoto end.

In very few circumstances does the Panasonic dmc-FZ1000 fail to hit its target. From startup to shutter press the camera is quick to lock on target and stick to it if tracking is being used. Combined with the zippy processor and high-speed continuous shooting, you can get a lot of sharp, accurate photos with this camera.

The inclusion of in-body 5-axis image stabilization is another +1 point for the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000. Blurriness caused by camera shake is a big problem at lower shutter speeds but image stabilization (IS) compensates for this. IS means there’s a better chance your images will be optimally sharp even if the Lumix dmc-FZ1000 is moving, whether on purpose or not.

I’d spend more time talking about the focusing capabilities of the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 but I feel like it’d be wasted. All that needs to be said is that the FZ1000’s focusing works very well.

Like any good autofocus system, you’ll forget that it’s even there, and there will be very few moments where you become frustrated with the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000’s autofocusing system.


Score: 4.5/5



Video on the FZ1000

Considering all that has been said up to this point in the review (i.e. focusing, low light performance, and processing times, in addition to 4k video), it is easy to state that Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 is a very capable video camera.

Though the inclusion of 4k is not as impressive as it was 4 years ago (more and more bridge cameras can shoot 4k these days), the FZ1000 still works very well as a 4k camera. For both video and stills, the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 is a great choice.

For videographers, 4k is a no-brainer as it is the current industry standard. Add in tight autofocus and quick processor and the FZ1000 is a competent machine.

Note that the FZ1000 extrapolates 4k from an 8Mp surface on the sensor, which effectively narrows the FOV to around 35-600mm. Telephoto lovers won’t mind this change but those needing wide angle shots may be peeved.

What is most notable about the FZ1000’s 4k video capability is the prospect of pulling stills from a video. When editing a 4k video frame-by-frame, 8Mp still images can be taken directly from 4k videos. This sort of technology makes it easier to nail those difficult action shots.

The potential of 4k technology for still photography is immense and becoming more and more popular within the community. As time goes on, expect to see 4k present in most cameras, bridge, DSLR, and beyond.


Score: 4/5



Battery Life

The Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 has a below average battery life when compared to other bridge cameras. It is rated at around 360 still shots per battery, which is an uninspiring number.

To be frank, the dmc-FZ1000’s battery life isn’t horrendous as this sort of capacity is common with bridge and mirrorless camera – just don’t expect something that will last as long as DSLR. Batteries are removable as well so photographers can carry several spares in their bag for longer shooting.


Score: 3.5/5


Lenses and Accessories

The Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 has all the usual ports that come standard in a well-rounded camera. This means shooters have several options for installing new accessories on FZ1000.

Aside from the usual suspects, the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 has an HDMI and microphone port. This bodes very well for videographers who want to improve the sound quality of their videos or stream videos live on a screen.

A standard hot shoe is also found on the camera, which allows you to mount a higher quality flash. The Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 has a built-in flash that pops up but, like most built-in flashes, it’s not very strong.

There is obviously no option to change the lens on the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000. This may be a silly thing to point out, as it’s why people look at bridge cameras in the first place but thought it was worth mentioning.


Score: 4/5



I'm convinced! Panasonic is mine


The Verdict on the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000

If it hasn’t been made clear already, we are still very excited about the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000. Thanks to its high-quality components and incorporation of cutting edge technology, this camera has aged well over the years.

Image quality is still top notch in the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000, thanks in part to its larger sensor. Though you won’t have as much reach as some of the newer bridge cameras, noise will still be less common with the FZ1000.

The Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 was fast before and is still fast now. Autofocusing is still at a competitive level and we’re eager to see how far it’ll go before becoming obsolete. (We don’t think that’s anytime soon.)

A fast processor backs the FZ1000 autofocusing ability, ensuring that you’ll be able to snap quick and accurate frames.

Panasonic was smart to include 4k video recording in the FZ1000; once a nice-to-have, this is now a necessity. Excluding such tech would’ve been a real downside.

The Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 is a bit bulky for a bridge camera and battery life is mediocre. In the grand scheme of things, these two faults are not deal breakers, and at the end of the day, the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 is still a very capable camera.

The real shining star of the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 is that it’s so inexpensive these days! The price of this camera has dropped to nearly 50% of its original value, which is a fuckin’ steal if you ask me.

Do want a fast camera with great autofocus and the ability to shoot 4k? Are you on a budget and need a camera that is reasonably priced? Then the Panasonic FZ1000 is the camera for you!


Final Scores

The Panasonic Lumix dmc-FZ1000 is for you if you…

Don’t want to worry about changing lenses

Want focal flexibility and fast processing speed

Need a larger sensor than the average bridge camera

Want superb autofocus and accurate EVF 

The Panasonic Lumix dmc-FZ1000 isn’t for you if you…

Are concerned about size and portability

Want an ND filter built into the camera

Need more battery life

Need something that can keep with a DSLR


I want the Panasonic travel camera


Sample Images from the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000


Yay for transparency! Some of the links in this post are affiliate links. This means that if you book your accommodation through the site, The Broke Backpacker will earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Your support helps keep the site going.

Need More Inspiration?


  • Avatar Margaret STEVENS says:

    I have had the same problem develop with 3 Panasonic Lumix bridge cameras – one 200 and two 1000s. Jessops, from whom I bought the cameras, have been brilliant, but the Panasonic Agency in the UK (DK AVS Horley) have provided a dismal service, so much so that Jessops have agreed to replace the camera for the second time. Because of the problems I have had, they would like me to get a different camera. However, I cannot find anything which matches the specs and performance for the Lumix FZ1000 in a similar price range. I have checked out a wide variety of makes and models. One thing I require is a manual focus ring and not a so-called electronic manual focus which is not manual in practice. I would also lose out on the various accessories I have bought which wouldn’t fit another camera.

    Before I choose yet another Panasonic Lumix FZ1000, I am wondering if you are aware of how common the problem is of Panasonic cameras overexposing on Aperture priority mode and not responding to the rear dial wheel which becomes completely unable to compensate? Have I just been very unlucky? Or could it possibly be my fault for some reason?

    I will explain the problem in more detail below. I am sorry it is a long explanation, but I really need to know how common this fault is. Please let me know.

    Here is a summary of the history of my problems with Panasonic Lumix cameras:
    I first bought a Lumix FZ200 in 2013. I wasted a lot of money having it repaired three times, but it still went wrong. It kept developing an intermittent fault of over-exposing on the Aperture Priority mode (A). When this fault occurs, manually reducing the exposure to -5 makes no difference – the photos are STILL over-exposed to the same degree, whether it is set to 0 or -5.
    In November 2018, I cut my losses, gave this camera to a friend in Uganda and bought a new camera in January 2019 from Jessops in Leicester.
    I bought another Lumix camera, this time an FZ1000. I believed I had just been unlucky with the previous camera and that a manufacturer with such a good reputation for making quality cameras would not regularly make cameras with the same fault. I also wanted a camera with a proper manual focus ring, which not many seem to have.
    Within 2 months of occasional use, the same fault (once again intermittent, not permanent) started again on my new Lumix camera while we were on a special winter cruise in Norway in March 2019. My preferred mode for taking almost all my photos is Aperture Priority (A). Without warning, the camera would go from taking photos properly exposed to over-exposing the same or similar subject even though they always looked fine through the view finder. Even when manually compensating to -5, the photos were still just as over-exposed on the A mode although they were fine on the iA mode. At first, turning the camera off and on again several times usually stopped the fault – until several days later when it occurred again. Not only is there less control, but photos taken in iA mode are not such good quality. I was therefore very disappointed – the same fault, albeit intermittent and occasional, that I had experienced with my previous FZ200 camera had occurred on a two-month-old more expensive camera.
    In May 2019, I went to the UK coast to take photos of sea birds flying over the sea and nesting on the cliffs of North Yorkshire. I got some good photos, despite the bright light and white birds. But then the camera developed the fault again, of over-exposing even though the subjects were fine through the view finder. I wrote to DK to complain about it, sending a few sample photos by email (I couldn’t send comparative photos because flying birds disappear). They dismissed it and said of course these photos would be over-exposed because of the bright conditions and white birds! Really?? Is it impossible to take good photos of white birds in bright sunlight? What good is a camera that can’t take consistently good photos in all circumstances when using appropriate settings? I decided to continue using the camera.
    In July 2019, I went back to the same location to try and take some more photos. Once again, the fault occurred – intermittently but more frequently. It was so frustrating and disappointing. I took some comparative photos using the A mode, P mode and iA mode – and then switched to iA as even on the P mode, the exposure was often not right although much better than on A mode.
    At this point, in July 2019, I decided to take the camera back to Jessops where I had bought it, and ask them to help as I was going on a once-in-a-lifetime holiday to Madagascar in September to photograph wildlife and so wanted a camera that wasn’t going to let me down. Since the camera was only two months old when it first showed the fault, I wanted it replaced because, surely, a brand new expensive camera which has hardly been used shouldn’t develop a fault, should it?? Jessops sent it back to DK, with some sample photos (see attached). Thankfully , they took notice of Jessops (having dismissed me in May) and examined the camera. Guess what – they found that there was indeed a fault (not damage). They refused to replace it with a new camera, saying that they would only replace it after three repairs. Anyway, they replaced several parts, namely a “replacement lens 3rd frame and the lens 5th frame unit”, stating that “this item is faulty not damaged” (see attached)
    What kind of a service and guarantee is that – that they will only replace a camera after it has been repaired three times? It implies that their cameras frequently go wrong and have to be repaired and that they will only accept defeat if it has to be repaired three times and still goes wrong. Or perhaps they hope it will be out of the warranty period by then and they will no longer be liable?
    I was very uneasy about taking a repaired camera that had developed the same fault as my previous camera to Madagascar, having lost confidence in Panasonic. After only a few days in Madagascar, it developed the same fault, albeit intermittent and occasional. Once again, the biggest problem was on the A mode. With identical settings (ie: compensating by reducing the exposure manually to -5), the photo on A mode was still completely over-exposed, on P mode slightly over-exposed, but on iA it was so dark there was little detail. The subject as seen in the view-finder in all 3 modes looked almost black. So with manual compensation set at -5, the photo taken on A mode was still completely washed out, the photo on P mode was just about acceptable (slightly over-exposed) and the photo taken on iA mode was blacked out.
    I had just 3 weeks between my return from Madagascar and my next trip to Uganda, so there wasn’t long to sort it out. I took it back to Jessops on 11.10.19 who sent it back to DK. They agreed that it wasn’t acceptable that it needed to be repaired a second time when both my previous camera and this new camera had developed the same problem again immediately after being repaired. I was not willing to accept another repair job when previous repair jobs had not solved the problem. Through Jessops, who were brilliant, I demanded a replacement camera. Jessops failed to get anywhere with DK, so agreed to replace the camera with another Lumix FZ1000 for me (on 25.10.19). I want to say at this point how impressed I have been with Jessops for their excellent customer care, unlike DK’s customer care which has been terrible.
    I set off for Uganda with my new (third) Lumix camera, assuming I had just been unlucky with the previous two cameras. But no!! It wasn’t just the previous cameras that developed this fault. This third, brand new replacement camera also developed the same fault after only a week.
    Whilst in Uganda, I also used the Lumix FZ200 which I had given my friend last year. Sometimes, the exposure was fine in A mode, but more often, it was over-exposing and we had to revert to iA.
    I have now had three Lumix cameras – and all have them have developed the same fault of sometimes over-exposing on the Aperture Priority mode without any warning and even when I have attempted to compensate manually by reducing the exposure to -5. It would seem Panasonic has a serious design fault. I can’t believe I have been so unlucky as to be the only person who has experienced this fault in all three Lumix cameras which I have owned. Maybe a lot of people with Lumix cameras don’t actually use the A mode, in which case they would not have suffered from this problem.

    This caused me upset because of being unable on so many occasions to take the quality of photos I expect, which can never be repeated or recaptured. I am also extremely dissatisfied and upset not just with DK’s service and poor customer care, but also with Panasonic.

  • Avatar Flip Lewis says:

    I have had mine since it came on the market..
    A superb bridge camera in every way.
    As good a my d series Nikon and no need to change lenses.
    I am now in the process of saving for the panny g9.
    I think both of theses cameras are truly underrated which hopefully will
    Be to my advantage as they are slowly coming down in price.
    Rock on panasonic.

  • Avatar Conchscooter says:

    I tried an FZ300 and liked it a lot. On a lark I bid on an unused FZ1000 on fleabay and got it it for $360 and discovered the value of the larger sensor. The easy connectivity to my phone (I shoot jpegs as I use it for fun and web postings) and the lack of faffing around with multiple lenses mean I am always with camera (and spare battery) in hand. I carry it turned off and by the time its to my eye the lense is out and focused and ready to go, it’s that fast. All the many settings are available for you to play with and experiment with which is great fun so every time I contemplate an interchangeable lens camera I wonder why I’d want to spend a few thousand to do what I do now with great ease and lack of financial commitment. My FZ300 sits in reserve in case I do drop the FZ1000 from a great height and horrors! it breaks. I’ll use the FZ300 until I get another FZ1000 for no money and lots of fun.

  • Avatar Mr Scorpio says:

    I’ve had the FZ1000 since Feb 2015. Fantastic camera!!! It has so many mid-level DSLR features, it’s not funny! Not mention that when it came out, it was the first bridge camera in the world to offer 4k video.
    Basically, Panasonic set the bar so damn high with this camera when it came out, that it still more than holds its own even today (September 2019).
    If fact, come 2020, this camera will still deliver the goods compared to the competition. . It took Sony until the RX10 mkIII to finally match the FZ1000. Only when 1″ sensors are 24mp will they really start to move ahead (not ignoring that 20mp is excellent already)

  • Avatar Charlie says:

    I’ve been shooting with this camera for a couple years now. My friends can hardly believe some of the images that come out of it. They say there’s just something special about it, and I’m starting to agree.

    Still want a Sony A7iii with an arsenol of primes, but this keep chooching.

  • Avatar eric says:

    the best of the best this camera will surprise u positively, for a non full frame camera.

  • Avatar David says:

    As a recent buyer of one these, I agree with most of what you say, however, the build quality issue needs to be emphasized with this camera in the context of it being used for travel. Mine has broken on the first trip i took it on. Compare that with my previous bridge, a Fujifilm from 2012 , which went with me to literally every corner of the globe, and only got broken when somebody dropped it from 5 foot (fair enough, I’d expect that to break it too).
    This is a really nice camera, however, I’d advise strongly against buying it if you are using it primarily for travel. There have to be more robust options out there. A shame.

    • Avatar Ralph Cope says:

      These are good points. Thanks for sharing David.

    • Avatar Charlie says:

      Took the fz100 to the Oregon dunes on a windy day and thought I ruined it when a stronger gust blew sand all up in the lens mechanics. Someway, some out, with a lot of banging and blowing it in jammed and it lives on. Great camera. It’s been on a lot of trips with me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *